Cases
Mesirov v. Enbridge Energy Co., Inc.
Corporate Governance / Derivative
Overview
Overview
- Date:
- 12/21/2018
- Case Caption:
- Mesirov v. Enbridge Energy Co., Inc., et al., Case No. 11314, Delaware Court of Chancery
- Status:
- Settled
- Settlement Status:
- Settled
- Court:
- Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware
Bragar Eagel & Squire, P.C., represented a limited partner of the master limited partnership Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P., in a derivative action against the general partner and other defendants arising out of a 2015 repurchase by the Partnership of a 66.6% interest in the U.S. segment of the Albert Clipper pipeline, which the Partnership had previously sold to its general partner for $800 million. Plaintiff alleged that defendants breached specific provisions of the limited partnership agreement by creating a “Special Tax Allocation” which re-allocated to the Public Unitholders millions of dollars of Partnership income that should have been allocated to shares held by the general partner. In addition, the complaint alleges that the repurchase of the interest in the pipeline was not on terms that were fair and reasonable to the Partnership. In March 2017, we secured an opinion from the Delaware Supreme Court reversing the Court of Chancery's dismissal of the complaint. The matter was dismissed after the Partnership was acquired by its parent in a "roll up" transaction. However, in the negotiations of the acquisition, the Partnership's Special Committee valued the claims at $111.2 million.
Case Updates
Notice of Dismissal of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. Derivative Litigation and Agreement on Attorneys’ Fees
Notice is hereby provided to all persons who held Class A common units of Enbridge Energy Partners, L.P. (“EEP”) immediately preceding the consummation of the Merger (as defined herein). The purpose of this notice is to inform you about developments with respect to the litigation in the Delaware Court of Chancery (the “Delaware Court”) captioned Mesirov v. Enbridge Energy Co., Inc., C.A. No. 11314-VCS (Del. Ch.) (the “Derivative Action”) previously described in the Schedule 14A Definitive Proxy Statement filed by EEP on November 9, 2018 (the “Proxy Statement”), including dismissal of the Derivative Action and an agreement by EEP to pay attorneys’ fees and expenses to counsel for Plaintiff (“Derivative Counsel”) in the Derivative Action.